Until it became Ultramax, it genuinely was Gold 200’s bigger brother.
Some might characterize this as “balanced”.OutdoorFill in your details below or click an icon to log in:Winner:The winner is…Fuji! The film stock is made in three speeds: 160, 400, and 800. Unfortunately, it seems to be a bit of a black sheep.If you were to go researching old versions of Kodak Ultramax 400 packaging, like I did before writing this, you’d find the film hasn’t always gone by its current name.One thing to note is skin tones may come out a little too yellow if you overexpose. Fuji gets more-fuji-y underexposed and can be a little cool and muted.
Kodak Ultramax 400. Fuji is more balanced again, and tends to render beautiful clouds and skies, among other things.Stuff starts to get weird when you underexpose your film, but sometimes if you are somewhere dark, like Boston (outside) or inside (subway station), and your are taking your shot hand-held, you don’t have many options. Continue reading below to find out more about Kodak Portra 400 vs. Kodak Portra 800 film stocks. The result is that I don’t carry around a mess of filters or flashes to get everything perfect. Indoors, Fuji is ok if ia little less “poppy”. And I’ve similarly been going back and forth between Portra 400 and Ektar 100. I like all the images you shared with us, Aukje. {{epochTranslation 'awaiting_moderation'}}While that’s the single most valid reason to like or dislike a film, it is a subjective one. Reply Mitch Zeissler August 25, 2016 at 3:59 pm. Nobody can tell these people they’re wrong, just as they can’t say you’re wrong for being an Ultramax fan.Copyright © 2020 My Favourite LensWhatever the reason, and it’s probably me rather than the films, I’m happier with the colour and contrast the Ultramax gave these than the Gold did when I shot that.For regular sized snapshots, it seems negligible, with the amount of grain overall perfectly acceptable for me. On the outside, Ultramax 400 isn’t anything to shout about. Yoon Films.
I’ve had better results with it – to my eye anyway – and appreciate the higher ISO is there should I ever need it.As well as some people disliking the look it gives, I wonder if part of the reason Ultramax isn’t as loved as Gold 200 is due to its current moniker.Kodak Ultramax is not a film you should have any trouble tracking down, picking up, and buying from an actual person in an actual shop.So if you’re asking what Kodak Ultramax 400 is, the simple answer is Kodak Gold 400 with a more comic book-sounding name. If shooting street on an overcast day, as the sun is going down, or even in and out of buildings, this can make all the difference.These include advanced T-Grain emulsion technology, optimised colour precision technology, better underexposure protection, great skin tones, and better pictures under more conditions.Sounding like a 1960s Japanese superhero isn’t a bad thing in itself, but maybe losing that name lineage to the 1980s is denying it that cult status Gold 200 enjoys as a timeless stock.You can check the prices and availability through the links below.A good number of the images I got with Ultramax were shot in the morning and afternoon sun, and the film reacted to that with good contrast.
Film Focused 72,356 views. You can still see the resemblance in the packaging in the image below, especially with the canisters.All this while still performing in the kind of bright sunlight I shot it in for these images you see here means you could potentially stick to Ultramax for all your street shooting, if you liked it enough to do so.When I reviewed Gold 200, I did talk about the warmness being too much if you wanted a more gritty street photography look and it being more suited to holiday or travel shots.Still, if you did want to take advantage of the convenience of the internet and order some online or compare prices, there are plenty of people who would be happy to help you out there.On there you’ll find recommended apertures and shutter speeds for different light conditions, a guide to which filter and exposure adjustments to use when shooting under different types of light, and a table of benefits and features of the film.In no particular order and all at ISO 400, I’ve seen boxes of Kodak Ultra, Kodak Ultra Gold, Kodak Gold Ultra, Kodak Max, Kodak Gold Max, and Kodak Max Versatility.Vintage Lenses and Film | Inspiration and CreationRegardless, let’s wrap this up by circling back to where we began.
Some film folks would say “its just a matter of kodak filter #x”, but unfortunately I don’t carry those around with me. With the wide exposure latitude though, you should be safe from this if you’re shooting at box speed and with a camera with a working light meter.And while it’s more expensive than both Gold and ColorPlus, it’s not like you’re walking around wasting a roll of Fujicolor Pro 400H on decisively missed moments.There may be others that I’ve missed. Kodak UltraMax 400 vs Portra 400. Kodak Portra. Kodak has really really vivid colors, but fuji is no slouch here either. Below is a comparison of the film in three different and common situations: indoor lighting, outdoor lighting, and “pushing” to iso 800 (underexposing one stop). Kodak Ultramax 400 is a film that somehow always manages to sneak its way into at least one of my cameras. Originally created in 1998, Kodak Portra film was made for portrait and wedding photography. It has the DX code 915373 and is developed using the regular C-41 process.