The remedies granted to the Intellectual Property holders are of three types: Criminal, Civil and Administrative Remedies. What about a student who “embellishes” his entrance application – claiming he was captain of the debate team, for example, when in fact he was only a minor participant.
The super-wealthy and privileged seem to cheat, whether on taxes, college admissions, or elsewhere, and get away with it. Each of these is discussed briefly below:(This may not be the same place you live)No- a large part of any tort lawsuit is set side for deciding which type of remedy is appropriate for the victim. Study 6: Types of civil remedies and their effectiveness flashcards from Sam Jones's class online, or in Brainscape's iPhone or Android app. It’s not clear all of them had the kind of intent we normally would require for a criminal conviction.I don’t know what the solution is, but we need a societal re-set on the appropriate use of criminal remedies. Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person.But what about the truly deserving students who were not admitted – aren’t they the true victims here? Here I quote:Breach of trust by public officerThat societal theory of ” I don’t know you, I rush to call the cops ” is really baseless with all due respect. It rightly caused widespread outrage based on the sense of privilege and entitlement demonstrated by the wealthy parents. Indian Trademark Law provides civil, criminal, as well as administrative remedies for taking action against infringement, dilution and/ or passing off of a trademark.
Let’s move on.” But just because something isn’t criminal doesn’t mean it’s not a problem. Look at all the contacts between the campaign and Russians! The defendants did not want to harm the universities – just the opposite. And it doesn’t mean there should not be some other kind of serious non-criminal consequences — whether that’s impeachment or just the results of the next election.In the entrance exam scheme, parents paid to have someone correct their child’s answers on admissions tests like the ACT, or take the test for them, to improve their score. In this I would be dealing with criminal remedies only. Just worth to note, that in many states in the world ( like Canada ) there is a residual offense, titled indeed as ” breach of trust”.Residual in that sense, that it doesn’t prescribe specific factual and mental configuration, constituting and offense. Sometimes this money went to bribe the coaches, who agreed to admit students even though they didn’t play the sport in question. Having ineligible athletes on their rosters exposed the universities to potential sanctions from the NCAA – a private organization that the universities voluntarily joined. There seems to be a trend in recent years for the public – and some prosecutors – to leap to criminal prosecution as the first option in response to various kinds of misconduct. But if you boil it down, it means Huffman was prosecuted and sent to jail for cheating on a test. But for many of the parents, the picture is more complicated.