On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Completely undo his entire presidency, as it was never valid.I’d like to see Trump just plain ignore the court’s decision. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients," Roberts added. Yes Im mean the so-called DOJ, the CIA, the FBI and so on without whom being crooked there is no Obama presidency and no one to cover his crimes.Sounds like an excellent plant to me!Article III, Section 1. 18-587, Donald Trump v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, No. "Instead, the majority has decided to prolong DHS’ initial overreach by providing a stopgap measure of its own," he wrote.
The decision will definitely affect the Trump’s reelection campaign.The candidates went through a great deal of checking before getting their 2 year work permits and protection from deportation.The Supreme Court concluded the closing of DACA infringed the Administrative Procedure Act (AP) by providing unclear details regarding the closing.In addition, he wrote that “the Department of Homeland Security can try again.”The Supreme Court concluded on June 18th that the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program was illicitly revoked by the Trump Administration. Among those consequences, he cited estimates that eliminating DACA would lead to the loss of $215 billion in economic activity and $60 billion in federal tax revenue over the next ten years.DACA, and the young immigrants it shields known as "Dreamers," are broadly popular among the public, and Trump had shied away from arguing against the program as a matter of policy.In a dissent joined by fellow conservatives Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the majority decision "must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision."The losses for conservatives at the high court threaten to minimize the political salience of one of the president's most frequent boasts — his appointment of conservative federal judges and Supreme Court justices."Rest assured that if the SC does what all say it must, based on the law, a bipartisan deal will be made to the benefit of all," Trump wrote in a post on Twitter last year, referring to the Supreme Court.The ruling gives Democrats, who have long seen DACA as a stopgap measure, more leverage in any future discussions."These wonderful DACA kids and their families have a huge burden lifted off their shoulders. SO if they do ‘have something on him’, it came BEFORE He was confirmed..Instead, let “We, the People” of the respective jurisdictions ELECT all federal judges. God will never let a Democrat win. Nationwide elections for the Supreme Court Justices. It promised protection to citizens who have been in the country since childhood.“We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies,“ Roberts wrote. Three of the conservative justices who dissented Thursday indicated they had concluded that DACA was flatly illegal in the first place, so the Trump administration was free to end it. ""The Court still does not resolve the question of DACA’s rescission," Alito wrote in his dissent.
I am a big fan of Reagan. We need more Justices or we will lose our 2nd. District-wide election for district judges. They don't have to worry about being deported, they can do their jobs, and, I believe, I do believe this, someday, someday soon, they will be American citizens," Schumer said.In a Fox News interview Wednesday night, Trump said he will "soon" be traveling to the U.S.-Mexico border to tout the construction of a border wall. Roberts reasoned that the Trump administration's termination of the program was "arbitrary and capricious," in violation of federal law that governs administrative procedure.Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inboxIn a subsequent tweet, Trump wrote: "Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn't like me?"It was not immediately clear what impact the court's decision will have on Trump's suggestion that he would seek a deal with Democrats on the immigration program if the Supreme Court allowed him to terminate it, though it's unlikely that meaningful action will be made on a new deal before November's election.Roberts wrote that those interests were not necessarily enough to ensure a loss for the administration. We're going to celebrate over 200 [miles built]," Trump said.The Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump on Thursday in a set of cases over his effort to end the Obama-era immigration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.He later pledged to produce "a new list of Conservative Supreme Court Justice nominees" by September, which he said he will pick from if a vacancy on the court opens up.But in a post on Twitter shortly after the DACA opinion was handed down, Trump spun that calculus around, arguing that the decisions show "We need more Justices or we will lose our 2nd.